Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: 9-Month Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Results and 12-Month Clinical Outcome
نویسندگان
چکیده
Results In-segment LLL was 0.68 0.57 mm in the BMS group and 0.12 0.43 mm in the SES group with a mean difference of 0.56 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.68 mm (p 0.001). Late stent malapposition at 9 months was present in 12.5% BMS patients and in 37.5% SES patients (p 0.001). Event-free survival at 12 months was 73.6% in BMS patients and 86.0% in SES patients (p 0.01). The target-vessel-failure-free survival was 84.7% in the BMS group and 93.0% in the SES group (p 0.02), mainly because of a higher target lesion revascularization rate in BMS patients (11.3% vs. 3.2%; p 0.006). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were not different.
منابع مشابه
Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, 3006 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to receive paclitaxe...
متن کاملVolumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis of Paclitaxel-eluting and bare metal stents in acute myocardial infarction: the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction intravascular ultrasound substudy.
BACKGROUND Vascular responses to drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are unknown. In the prospective, multicenter Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours of symptom onset were randomized 3:1 to TAXUS EXPRESS paclitaxel-eluting...
متن کاملInterventional Cardiology Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (ESSENCE-DIABETES) Results From the ESSENCE-DIABETES Trial
Background—Drug-eluting stents significantly improved angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with bare metal stents in diabetic patients. However, a comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in diabetic patients has not been evaluated. Therefore we compared effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus....
متن کاملRandomised comparison of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stenting in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
OBJECTIVE The superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is well studied; however, randomised data in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate whether stenting with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) safely reduces restenosis in pat...
متن کاملDrug-eluting versus bare metal stents in patients with st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: eight-month follow-up in the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) trial.
BACKGROUND Implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) limits the rate of coronary restenosis in most patients with coronary artery disease, but data are scarce with regard to their use in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and in connection with distal protection of the microvascular perfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS We rando...
متن کامل